HCR 9  - AS INTRODUCED

 

 

2024 SESSION

24-2753

08/10

 

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 9

 

A RESOLUTION rescinding the application to the Congress of the United States of America to call a convention pursuant to the terms of Article V of the United States Constitution.

 

SPONSORS: Rep. McCarter, Belk. 8

 

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

ANALYSIS

 

This concurrent resolution rescinds the adoption House Concurrent Resolution 40 passed on May 31, 2012 which is an application to the congress of the United States of America to call a convention pursuant to the terms of Article V of the United States Constitution.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

 

24-2753

08/10

 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

 

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Four

 

A RESOLUTION rescinding the application to the Congress of the United States of America to call a convention pursuant to the terms of Article V of the United States Constitution.

 

Whereas, the general court of the state of New Hampshire acting in the best of intentions, had, on May 31, 2012 passed House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 40 which is an application to the congress of the United States of America to call for an Article V Convention; and

Whereas, the Declaration of Independence proclaims that “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish” their form of government whenever it fails to secure their rights, which implies that a convention of representatives of the sovereign people in an Article V “convention for proposing amendments” would have the inherent power to propose sweeping changes to the Constitution any limitations or restrictions purportedly imposed by the states in applying for such a convention or conventions to the contrary notwithstanding, thereby creating an imminent peril to the well-established rights of the citizens and the duties of various levels of government as defined by our present Constitution; and

Whereas, the constitution of the United States of America has been amended many times in the history of this nation and may be amended many more times, without the need to resort to an Article V constitutional convention, and has been interpreted for more than two hundred years and has been found to be a sound document which protects the lives and liberties of the citizens; and

Whereas, there is great danger in subjecting our form of government, which is based on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, to sweeping changes that would undermine its philosophical foundation of instituting government based on the principle of securing God-given rights; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the New Hampshire general court does hereby rescind HCR 40 passed on May 31, 2012 which is an application by the general court of the state of New Hampshire to the Congress of the United States of America to call a convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, pursuant to the terms of Article V; and

Be it further resolved that the general court of the state of New Hampshire urges the legislatures of each and every state which have applied to Congress to call a convention for either a general or a limited constitutional convention, to repeal, and withdraw such applications.